106學年第1學期課程綱要

@尊重智慧財產權,請同學勿隨意影印教科書 。
Please respect the intellectual property rights, and shall not copy the textbooks arbitrarily.

一、課程基本資料
開課序號 1407 課程學制
科目代碼 EAC9005 課程名稱 儒學與全球政經脈絡
英文名稱 Confucianism and Globalizing Political-Economic Context
全/半年 必/選修 選修
學分數 3.0 每週授課時數 正課時數: 3 小時
開課系級 東亞系(學)大碩合開漢學與文化組
先修課程
課程簡介 儒學與全球政經脈絡課程以全球化政經脈絡為背景探究儒學的當代價值與難題,重點有四:(一)理解全球政經發展的主要脈絡,(二)探討中國儒學復興的當代意涵,(三)分析儒學在全球政經脈絡下的價值,以及(四)討論儒學在全球政經脈絡下之可能挑戰與機遇。
課程目標 對應系所核心能力
1. 理解全球政經發展的主要脈絡 碩士:
 1-5 具備跨領域、跨文化的策略知識以及人文社會的科際整合能力。
 4-3 能夠懷抱開放、宏觀、前瞻的全球視野,並體認東亞文化的特色與價值,理性參與公共事務。
2. 探討中國儒學復興的當代意涵 碩士:
 1-1 瞭解國際漢學與文化思想、區域政治與經濟的基礎內涵與深度素養。
 1-3 掌握並開創漢學與文化、政治與經濟的歷史發展、專業課題、研究方法與趨勢脈動。
3. 分析儒學在全球政經脈絡下的價值 碩士:
 2-1 具備獨立從事漢學文化與東亞文化思想,以及國際政治經濟之基礎研究能力。
 2-3 具有採集、調查與學術研究所需之語言、文獻與文本應用能力。
4. 討論儒學在全球政經脈絡下之可能挑戰與機遇 碩士:
 3-1 具有宏觀思惟、獨立思考、專業研究與批判反省的能力。
 3-2 具有尊重包容多元文化的世界觀與人文素養。

二、教學大綱
授課教師 陳文政
教學進度與主題

Week 1: Introduction

Part I: MainTrends of the Globalizing Politics and Economy

Week 2: Globalization: Dynamics, Characteristics,and Dimensions

Week 3: Main Trends of Globalizing Politics

Week 4: Main Trends of Economic Globalization

Week 5: The Interplay between Globalizing Politicsand Economy

 

Part II: The Revival of Confucianism in China

Week 6: The Trendof the Confucianism’s Revival inChina

Week 7: Implications of the Confucianism’s Revival inChina

Week 8: The Role of Taiwan in the Revival ofConfucianism

 

Part III: Significances ofConfucianism in Global Context

Week 9: Global Politics & Economy with Extrinsic Motivation-Oriented Character

Week 10: Confucianism: A System with Intrinsic Motivation-OrientedCharacter

Week 11: Significances ofConfucian Political Thoughts in Global Politics

Week 12: Significances ofConfucian Value Discourses in Global Economy

Week 13: Confucianism and the Global Ethics in Global Politics and Economy

Week 14: Unity in Diversity: Confucianism and Global Constitutionalism

 

Part IV: The Reality ofConfucianism: Possible Challenges and Opportunities

Week 16: The Possible Challenges of Confucianism in Global Context

Week 17: The Possible Opportunities of Confucianism in Global Context

Week 18: ConcludingDiscussion
教學方法
方式 說明
講述法 講述全球化趨勢與全球政經發展主要脈絡
討論法 討論儒學在全球政經脈絡下的價值與可能面對之議題
問題解決教學 針對儒學在全球政經脈絡下的價值與可能面對之議題,由師生共同思考可能之解決方法。
媒體融入教學 引證媒體有關全球政經發展與儒學復興之分析報導,以強化學習效果
評量方法
方式 百分比 說明
作業 30 % 依指定閱讀文獻撰寫研讀報告進行形成性評量
課堂討論參與 10 % 從課堂討論參與情形了解學習者之學習態度
出席 10 % 藉由出席課程參與課程討論
報告 50 % 就全學期所學繳交學期報告
參考書目

參考書目

一、英文文獻

Angle, Stephen C. (2012), Contemporary Confucian Political Philosophy (Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press).

Beek, Ursula van (2015), Democracy Compared- Complexities and Values, Taiwan Journal of Democracy, Vol.11, No.1, pp.1-16. (PJ118)

Bell, Daniel A. (2010), Reconciling Socialism and Confucianism? Reviving Tradition in China, 57(1) Dissent 91-99. (LJ2361)

Bell, Daniel A. (2015), The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press) (PB)

Bell, Daniel A. and Chenyang Li (2013), The East Asian Challenge for Democracy- Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective (New York: Cambridge University Press). (PB)

Berg-Schlosser, Dirk (2015), The Impact of the Great Recession on Regime Change- Economic and Political Interactions, 11(1) Taiwan Journal of Democracy 37-52. (PJ122)

Bradlow, Daniel D. (2013), A Framework for Assessing Global Economic Governance, 54 Boston College Law Review 971-1003. (LJ2147)

Bray, Daniel and Steven Slaughter (2015), Global Democratic Theory: A Critical Introduction (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press). (PB)

Calo, Ryan (2014), Digital Market Manipulation, George Washington Law Review, Vol.82, No.4, pp. 995-1051.(LJ2441)

Chen, Wen Cheng and Shirley Chi Chu (2016), Taking Global Constitutionalism Seriously: A Framework for Discourse, National Taiwan University Law Review, Vol.11, No.2, pp. 383-427.

Chu, Yun-han (2012), China and East Asian Democracy: The Taiwan Factor, Journal of Democracy, Vol.23, No.1, 42-56. (LJ1433)

Chu, Yun-han (2013), Introduction- Contenting Perspectives on Sources of Institutional Trust and Regime Support in East Asia, 9(1) Taiwan Journal of Democracy 1-11. (PJ91)

Chu, Yun-han and Bridget Welsh(2015), Millennials and East Asia’s Democratic Future, Journal of Democracy, Vol.26, No.2, pp. 151-164. (PJ176)

Cooley, Alexander ( 2015), Authoritarianism Goes Global- Countering Democratic Norms, Journal of Democracy, Vol.26, No.3, pp. 49-63.(PJ117)

Diamond, Larry (2008), The Democratic Rollback-The Resurgence of the Predatory State, Foreign Affairs, Vol.87, No.2, pp. 36-48. (PJ133)

Diamond, Larry (2012), China and East Asian Democracy: The Coming Wave, Journal of Democracy, Vol.23, No.1, 5-13. (LJ1432)

Diamond, Larry (2015), Facing up to the Democratic Recession, Journal of Democracy, Vol.26, No.1, pp. 141-155. (LJ2487)

Diamond, Larry (2016), In Search of Democracy, (New York: Routledge). (PB)

Diamond, Larry, Marc F. Plattner and Yun-han Chu (eds.) (2013), Democracy in East Asia- A New Century, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. (PB)

Druzin, Bryan H. and Jessica Li (2015), Myth Meets Reality: Civil Disobedience in the Age of Internet, 55 Virginia Journal of International Law Digest 29-35. (LJ2692)

Engle, Karen (2000), Culture and Human Rights: the Asian Values Debate in Context, 32 International Law and Politics 291-333. (LJ2019)

Englehart, Neil A. (2000), Rights and Culture in the Asian Values Argument: The Rise and Fall of Confucian Ethics in Singapore, 22 Human Rights Quarterly 548-568. (LJ2020)

Ewing, KD (2015), The Death of Social Europe, 26(1) King’s Law Jounal 76-98. (PJ199)

Foa, Roberto Stefan and Yascha Mounk (2016), The Danger of Deconsolidation- The Democratic Disconnect, 27(3) Journal of Democracy 5-17. (PJ187)

Foa, Roberto Stefan and Yascha Mounk (2017), The Signs of Deconsolidation, 28(1) Journal of Democracy 5-15. (PJ197)

Fox, Russell Arben (2001), Confucian and Communitarian Responses to Liberal Democracy, 59 The Review of Politics 561-592. (LJ2596)

Fukuyama, Francis (2005), Confucianism and Democracy, in Larry Diamond, Marc F. Plattner, and Philip J. Costopoulos (eds.), World Religions and Democracy (Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press), pp.42-55. (PB)

Fukuyama, Francis (2012), Patterns of History, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 23(1), pp. 14-26. (PJ73)

Fukuyama, Francis (2015), Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy (New York: Farrer, Straus and Giroux). (PB)

Fukuyama, Francis (2015), Why Democracy Is Performing So Poorly, 26(1) Journal of Democracy 11-20. (PJ 191)

Fukuyama, Francis (2016), Reflections on Chinese Governance, Journal of Chinese Governance, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 379-391. (PJ 192)

Garcia, Frank J. (2013), Introduction: Globalization, Power, States, and the Role of Law, 54 Boston College Law Review 903-919. (LJ2111; LJ2289)

Ginsburg, Tom (2010), Eastphalia as the Perfection of Westphalia, 17(1) Indiana Law of Global Legal Studies 27-45. (LJ1647)

Ginsburg, Tom (2011), Eastphalia and Asian Regionalism, 44 University of California Davis 859-877. (LJ1574)

Goldin, Ian and Tiffany Vogel (2010), Global Governance and Systemic Risk in the 21st Century: Lessons from the Financial Crisis, 1(1) Global Policy 4-15. (LJ2793)

He, Baogan (2010), Four Models of the Relationship between Confucianism and Democracy, 37(1) Journal of Chinese Philosophy 18-33. (LJ2035)

He, Baogang (2016), Confucianism and Democracy: Testing Four Analytical Models in an Empirical World, 12(2) Taiwan Journal of Democracy 59-84. (PJ202)

Held, David and Pietro Maffettone eds. (2016), Global Political Theory (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press). (PB)

Herr, Ranjoo Seodu (2010), Confucian Democracy and Equality, 20(3) Asian Philosophy 261-282. (LJ2034)

Hood, Steven J. (1998), The Myth of Asian-Style Democracy, 38(9) Asian Survey 853-866. (LJ2016)

Howse, Robert and Kalypso Nicolaidis (2016), Toward a Global Ethics of Trade Governance: Subsidiarity Writ Large, 79(2) Law & Contemporary Problems 259-283. (LJ2863)

Kagan, Robert (2015), The Weight of Geopolitics, 26(1) Journal of Democracy 21-31. (PJ179)

Kang, Xiaoguang (2006), Confucianization: A Future in the Tradition, 72 Social Research 77-120. (LJ2025)

Kim, Sungmoon (2014), Confucian Democracy in East Asian- Theory and Practice (New York: Cambridge University Press). (PB)

Kim, Yung-Myung (1997), Asian-Style Democracy: A Critique from East Asia, 37 Asian Survey 1119-1134. (LJ2015)

Krastev, Ivan (2011), Paradoxes of the New Authoritarianism, 22 (2) Journal of Democracy 5-16. (PJ70)

Kurlantzick, Joshua (2013), Democracy in Retreat- The Revolt of the Middle Class and the Worldwide Decline of Representative Government (New Haven: Yale University Press).

Lechner, Frank J. and John Boli (Eds.) (2015), The Globalization Reader (5th Edition), Oxford, U.K.: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Lee, Fredrick J. (2010), Global Institutional Choice, 85 New York U. L. Rev. 328-357. (LJ1093)

Liu, Shu-Hsien (2011), Reflections on Globalization from a Neo-Confucian Perspective, Journal of Chinese Philosophy, Vol.38, No.1, pp.105-117. (LJ2037)

McKinsey Global Institute (2016), Digital Globalization: The New Era of Global Flows (McKinsey Global Institute & Co.)

Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina (2016), The Quest of Good Governance: Learning from Virtuous Circles, 27(1) Journal of Democracy 95-110. (PJ153)

Nathan, Andrew J. (2013), Foreseeing the Unforeseeable, 24(1) Journal of Democracy 21-25. (LJ1993)

Nathan, Andrew J. (2015), China’s Challenges, 26(1) Journal of Democracy 156-170.(PJ174)

Nathan, Andrew J. (2016), The Puzzle of Chinese Middle Class, 27(2) Journal of Democracy 5-19.(LJ2733)

Neher, Clark D. (1994), Asian Style Democracy, 34(11) Asian Survey 949-961. (LJ2014)

Pei, Minxin (2016), Transition in China? More Likely Than You Think, 27(4) Journal of Democracy 5-20.

Perry, Elizabeth (2013), The Illiberal Challenge of Authoritarian China, 8(2) Taiwan Journal of Democracy 3-15. (PJ82)

Plattner, Marc F. (2002), Globalization and Self-Government, 13(3) Journal of Democracy 54-67. (PJ49)

Plattner, Marc F. (2013), Reflections on “Governance,” 24(4) Journal of Democracy 17-28. (PJ168)

Puddington, Arch and Tyler Roylance (2017), Populists and Autocrats: The Dual Threat to Global Democracy, in Freedom House Report, Freedom in the World 2017, pp.1-24. (PJ225)

Puppas, Takis S. (2016), The Specter Haunting Europe: Distinguishing Liberal Democracy’s Challengers, Journal of Democracy, Vol.27, No.4, pp. 22-36. (LJ2844)

Ritzer, George and Paul Dean (2015), Globalization: A Basic Text 2nd Edition, Oxford, U.K.: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Sandel, Michael (2012), What Money Can’t Buy- The Moral Limits of Markets, London: Allen Lane. (LB)

Shin, Doh Chull (2012), Confucianism and Democratization in East Asia, New York: Cambridge University Press. (PB)

Shin, Doh Chull and Hannah June Kim (2016), Do People in East Asia Truly Prefer Democracy to Its Alternatives? Western Theories versus East Asian Realities, Asian Barometer- A Comparative Survey of Democracy, Governance and Development, Working Paper Series, No. 117, pp.1-52. (PJ217)

Spina, Nicholas, Doh C. Shin, and Dana Cha (2011), Confucianism and Democracy: A Review of the Opposing Conceptualizations, 12(1) Japanese Journal of Political Science 143-160. (LJ1992)

Tushnet, Mark (2015), Authoritarian Constitutionalism, Cornell Law Review, Vol.100, pp. 391-461. (LJ2484) (cf LJ2633)

Walker, Christopher (2016), The Authoritarian Threat- The Hijacking of “Soft Power,” 27(1) Journal of Democracy 49-63. (LJ2742)

Walker, Christopher (2016), Dealing with the Authoritarian Resurgence, in Larry Diamond, Marc F. Plattner, and Christopher Walker eds., Authoritarianism Goes Global- The Challenge to Democracy, Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 216-233. (PB)

Wang, Zhengxu and Ern Ser Tan (2013), The Conundrum of Authoritarian Resiliency- Hybrid and Nondemocratic Regimes in East Asia, 9(1)Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 199-219. (PJ99)

Yang, Dali L. (2016), China’s Developmental Authoritarianism: Dynamics and Pitfalls, 12(1) Taiwan Journal of Democracy 45-70. (PJ203)

Youngs, Richard (2015), Exploring “Non-Western Democracy,” 26(4) Journal of Democracy 140-154. (PJ175)

Youngs, Richard (2015), The Puzzle of Non-Western Democracy (Washington D.C.: Carnegie, Endowment for International Peace) (PB)

二、中文文獻

丹尼羅德里克(Dani Rodrik)著,陳信宏譯(2016),《全球化矛盾-民主與世界經濟的未來》(The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy),台北:衛城。

史迪格里茲(Joseph E. Stiglitz)著,羅耀宗譯(2013),《不平等的代價:破解階級對立的金權結構》,台北:遠見天下文化。

朱雲漢 (2015),《高思在雲: 一個知識份子對二十一世紀的思考》,台北:遠見天下文化。

伍海德(Andrew Heywood)著,李賜賢、陳宛郁、劉泰廷譯(2013),《全球政治》(Global Politics),台北:五南。

李明輝(2008),《儒家視野下的政治思想》,臺北:臺大出版中心。

姚中秋(2012),〈儒家復興與中國思想、政治之走向:一個自由主義者的立場〉,《儒家與現代政治》,臺北:聯經,頁145-174

許倬雲,《現代文明的批判:剖析人類未來的困境》,臺北:天下文化,2014

張崑將(2012),〈近世東亞儒者對忠孝倫常衝突之詮釋比

較〉,潘朝陽主編《跨文化視域下的儒家倫常》(上

冊)(台北:師大出版中心),頁177-213

張崑將(2015),〈儒學復興中知識份子對「東亞儒學」的探討之思考〉,《哲學與文化》第42卷第9期,頁69-91

陳文政主編(2013),〈儒家哲學與政治發展專題〉,《哲學與文化》,409期。

陳文政、單文婷(2013),〈儒學與民主:中國大陸民主化脈絡下之挑戰與機遇〉,《哲學與文化》,409期,頁113 - 137

陳文政(2015),〈教育及經濟全球化脈絡下華人教師典範之自我形塑:認知與行為層次的分析〉,香港中文大學教育學報432期,頁1-25

陳文政主編(2015),〈全球化與儒學復興專題〉,《哲學與文化》,429期。

陳文政、許禎元2015),〈儒家價值論述及其當代意涵:市場經濟全球化脈絡下的分析〉,《哲學與文化》,429期,頁129-164

陳昭瑛(2012),〈徐復觀與自由主義的對話〉,《儒家與現代政治》,臺北:聯經,頁175-193

曾怡仁(2013),《國際政治經濟學理論》,台北:三民。

  城,陳偉杰(2013),〈儒學與民主:台灣民主化脈絡下的回顧與前瞻〉,《哲學與文化》,40 9 期,頁89-112

湯馬斯˙佛里曼(Thomas L. Friedman)著,廖月娟、李芳齡譯(2017),《謝謝你遲到了:一個樂觀主義者在加速時代的繁榮指引》(Thank You for Being Late- An Optimist’s Guide to Thriving in the Age of Accelerations),台北:遠見天下文化。

傑佛瑞˙薩克斯(Jeffrey Sachs)著,廖月娟譯(2013),《文明的代價》,台北:遠見天下文化。

葉仁昌(2010),〈「儒家與民主」議題的轉向全球資本主義衝擊下的呼籲〉,《政治科學論叢》,44期,頁1-34

葉仁昌(2011),〈孟子政治思想中義利之辨的分析:四種主要類型的探討〉,《政治科學論叢》,50期,頁1-36

楊國榮(2009),《善的歷程:儒家價值體系研究》,上海:華東師大出版社。

蔡德貴(2004),〈試論美國的儒家學派〉,《中國人民大學學報》,5期,頁74-85

劉述先(2001《全球倫理與宗教對話》。台北:立緒文化。

劉述先(2010《儒家哲學的典範重構與詮釋》。台北:萬卷樓。

劉國強(2004),〈全球化發展與儒家價值教育的資源〉,香港中文大學《教育學報》322,頁1-37

 

版權所有 © 2024 國立臺灣師範大學