106學年第1學期課程綱要 |
@尊重智慧財產權,請同學勿隨意影印教科書 。 Please respect the intellectual property rights, and shall not copy the textbooks arbitrarily. |
一、課程基本資料 |
開課序號 | 1388 | 課程學制 | |
科目代碼 | SWM0068 | 課程名稱 | 兒少福利與家庭服務專題 |
英文名稱 | Special Topics on Child and Youth Welfare and Family Services | ||
全/半年 | 半 | 必/選修 | 選修 |
學分數 | 3.0 | 每週授課時數 | 正課時數: 3 小時 |
開課系級 | 社工所(碩) | ||
先修課程 | |||
課程簡介 | 本課程著重探討兒童少年與家庭服務的相關議題與政策以及實務方案。課程規劃主要包含三大主軸。首先介紹主要理論模型,培養學生能有系統且具批判性地思考兒少家庭相關議題與政策。其次,以三級預防的架構從政策面與實務面雙向切入我國兒少與家庭福利服務。最後,引介西方現行兒少與家庭福利服務方案,從社經與文化背景等各方面討論西方服務方案對應台灣現況的啟發和限制。 | ||
課程目標 | 對應系所核心能力 | ||
1. 學習兒少福利與家庭服務的理論與知能 | 碩士: 1-1 具備社會工作理論的知識 1-3 具備多元文化的知識 |
||
2. 瞭解兒少與家庭服務方案與實施 | 碩士: 2-1 具備社會工作的實務能力 2-2 具備社會工作的研究能力 3-1 具備社會工作者的助人特質 |
||
3. 反思兒少福利與家庭服務之研究與實務議題 | 碩士: 2-2 具備社會工作的研究能力 3-3 具備批判與反思的特質 |
||
4. 兒少與家庭多元服務方案的實踐與應用 | 碩士: 1-3 具備多元文化的知識 4-3 關懷弱勢及尊重多元差異 |
二、教學大綱 |
授課教師 | 李孟蓉 | ||
教學進度與主題 | |||
第一週:課程介紹,說明上課方式與評分標準。師生彼此認識,瞭解學生之興趣專長
主題一:兒少與家庭議題主要理論模型 第二週 9/20 Risk: Childhood Adverse Experiences & Cumulative Risk Model 第三週 9/27 Family Stress Theory 第四週 10/4 中秋節放假 第五週 10/11 Resilience: The science of prevention and family resilience framework
主題二:兒少與家庭福利服務政策與方案 第六週 10/18 兒少福利和家庭服務政策發展 第七週 10/25 支持性/預防性家庭服務:台灣現況 & 美國預防性服務分享 第八週 11/01 支持性/預防性家庭服務 II 第九週 11/08 兒少保護與家庭處遇方案 第十週 11/15 兒少寄養服務議題 (一) 親屬寄養、寄養家庭 第十一週 11/22兒少寄養服務議題 (二) 機構寄養 第十二週 11/29兒少寄養服務議題 (三) 青少年自力方案 第十三週 12/06兒少收出養服務議題
主題三:兒少與家庭服務專題討論 第十四週 12/13專題討論一:目睹暴力兒少服務議題 實務工作者分享 小組報告 第十五週 12/20專題討論二:多元文化與兒少家庭福利服務議題 小組報告 第十六週 12/27專題討論三:中輟與家庭服務議題 小組報告 第十七週 01/03專題討論四:毒品濫用與家庭服務議題 小組報告 第十八週 01/10 課程總結與期末書面報告繳交 |
|||
教學方法 | |||
方式 | 說明 | ||
講述法 | 老師導讀與講解相關理論知識 | ||
討論法 | 針對每週主題提出問題與反思 | ||
合作學習 | 小組口頭報告,透過課堂討論與老師同儕交流共同學習 | ||
媒體融入教學 | 運用 PPT、課程網站與影片等多媒體,協助同學於課堂上和課堂外繼續學習 | ||
專題研究 | 以兒少與家庭服務為主題進行分析,並於期末分享專題研究成果 | ||
其他 | 邀請實務工作者進行專題演講和交流 | ||
評量方法 | |||
方式 | 百分比 | 說明 | |
作業 | 30 % | 每週上課繳交本週閱讀摘要並提出 1-2個問題 | |
課堂討論參與 | 25 % | 小組報告:專題系列,課堂帶領並繳交書面報告 | |
報告 | 20 % | 參與課堂討論 | |
專題 | 25 % | 個人書面報告 | |
參考書目 |
Anda, R. F.,Felitti, V. J., Bremner, J. D., Walker, J. D., Whitfield,C. H., Perry, B. D., ... & Giles, W. H. (2006). The enduring effects ofabuse and related adverse experiences in childhood. European archivesof psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 256(3), 174-186. Appleyard,K., Egeland, B., Dulmen, M. H., & Alan Sroufe, L. (2005). When more is notbetter: The role of cumulative risk in child behavior outcomes. Journalof child psychology and psychiatry, 46(3), 235-245. Bagdasaryan,S. (2005). Evaluating family preservation services: Reframing the question ofeffectiveness. Children and Youth Services Review , 27, 615- 635. Boss,P., Bryant, C. M., & Mancini, J. A. (2016). Family Stress: an overview. InP. Boss, C. M. Bryant, J. A. Mancini (Eds), Family stress management: Acontextual approach (1-23). Los Angles: Sage Publications. Boss,P., Bryant, C. M., & Mancini, J. A. (2016). The contextual model of FamilyStress. In P. Boss, C. M. Bryant, J. A. Mancini (Eds), Family stressmanagement: A contextual approach (24-52). Los Angles: Sage Publications. Boss, P.(2016). Coping, Adapting, Being Resilient...or Is It Managing? In P. Boss, C.M. Bryant, J. A. Mancini (Eds),Family stress management: Acontextual approach (102-122). Los Angles: Sage Publications. Brady, S.S., Winston, W., & Gockley, S. E. (2014). StressRelated ExternalizingBehavior among African American Youth: How Could Policy and Practice TransformRisk into Resilience? Journal of Social Issues, 70(2),315-341. Brown, E.C., Hawkins, J. D., Rhew, I. C., Shapiro, V. B., Abbott, R. D., Oesterle,S., Arthur, M. W., Briney, J. S., & Catalano, R. F. (2014). Preventionsystem mediation of Communities That Care effects on youth outcomes. PreventionScience, 15(5), 623-632. Brumley, L.D., Jaffee, S. R., & Brumley, B. P. (2017). Pathways from ChildhoodAdversity to Problem Behaviors in Young Adulthood: The Mediating Role ofAdolescents’ Future Expectations. Journal of youth and adolescence, 46(1),1-14. Dunst, C. J.& Trivette, C. M. (2009). Capacity-building family-systemsintervention practices. Journal of Family Social Work , 12,119–143. Edwards,V. J., Holden, G. W., Felitti, V. J., & Anda, R. F. (2003). Relationshipbetween multiple forms of childhood maltreatment and adult mental health incommunity respondents: results from the adverse childhood experiencesstudy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(8),1453-1460. Evans,G. W., Li, D., & Whipple, S. S. (2013). Cumulative risk andchild development. Psychological Bulletin, 139(6), 1342-1396. Font, S. A.(2014). Kinship and nonrelative foster care: The effect of placement type onchild wellbeing. Child development, 85(5),2074-2090. Guo,J. & Gilbert, N. (2007) Welfare state regimes and family policy: alongitudinal analysis. International Social Welfare, 16, 3007-313. Haggerty, K.P., Skinner, M. L., Catalano, R. F., Abbott, R. D., & Crutchfield, R. D.(2015). Long- term effects of Staying Connected with Your Teen on drug usefrequency at age 20. Prevention Science, 16(4), 538-549. Hawkins, J.D., Jenson, J. M., Catalano, R., Fraser, M. W., Botvin, G. J., Shapiro, V.,Brown, C. H., Beardslee, W., Brent, D., Leslie, L. K., Rotheram-Borus, M. J.,Shea, P., Shih, A., Anthony, E., Haggerty, K. P., Bender, K., Gorman-Smith, D.,Casey, E., & Stone, S. (2015). Unleashing the power of prevention.Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. Holland, S.(2004). Child and Family Assessment in Social Work Practice . London: Sage. January, S.A. A., Mason, W. A., Savolainen, J., Solomon, S., Chmelka, M. B., Miettunen,J., ... & Järvelin, M. R. (2017). Longitudinal Pathways from CumulativeContextual Risk at Birth to School Functioning in Adolescence: Analysis ofMediation Effects and Gender Moderation. Journal of Youth andAdolescence, 46(1), 180-196. Jones, T.M., Hill, K. G., Epstein, M., Lee, J. O., Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. F.(2016). Understanding the interplay of individual and social–developmentalfactors in the progression of substance use and mental health from childhood toadulthood. Development and psychopathology, 28(03),721-741. Kemp, S. P.,Marcenko, M. O., Hoagwood, K., & Vesneski, W. (2009). Engaging parents inchild welfare services: Bridging family needs and child welfare mandates.Child Welfare, 88(1), 101-126. Kumpfer, K.,Magalhães, C., & Xie, J. (2016). Cultural Adaptation and Implementation ofFamily Evidence-BasedInterventions with Diverse Populations. PreventionScience, 1-11. Linder,S. H., & Sexton, K. (2011). Conceptual models for cumulative riskassessment. American Journal of Public Health, 101(S1), S74-S81. Lee, B. R.,Ebesutani, C., Kolivoski, K. M., Becker, K. D.,Lindsey, M. A., Brandt, N. E.,... & Barth, R. P. (2014). Program and practice elements for placementprevention: a review of interventions and their effectiveness in promotinghome-based care. American Journal ofOrthopsychiatry, 84(3), 244-256. McCubbin, H.I., & Patterson, J. M. (1983). The family stress process: The double ABCXmodel of adjustment and adaptation. Marriage& Family Review, 6(1-2),7-37. Patterson,J. M. (2002). Integrating family resilience and family stress theory. Journal of marriage and family, 64(2), 349-360. Rhew, I. C.,Hawkins, J. D., Murray, D. M., Fagan, A. A., Oesterle, S., Abbott, R. D., &Catalano, R. F. (2016). Evaluation of community-level effects of CommunitiesThat Care on adolescent drug use and delinquency using a repeatedcross-sectional design. Prevention Science, 17, 177-187. Salazar, A.M., Haggerty, K. P., Catalano, R. F., de Haan, B., Vann, T., & Vinson, J.(2016). Using Communities That Care for community child maltreatmentprevention. American Journal ofOrthopsychiatry,86(12), 144-155. Stahmer, A.C., Leslie, L. K., Hurlburt, M., Barth, R. P., Webb, M. B., Landsverk, J.,& Zhang, J. (2005). Developmental and behavioral needs and service use foryoung children in child welfare. Pediatrics,116(4),891-900. Van Ryzin,M. J., Kumpfer, K. L., Fosco, G. M., & Greenberg, M. T. (Eds.). (2015). Family-based prevention programs forchildren and adolescents: Theory, research, and large-scale dissemination.Psychology Press. Walsh, F.(2003). Family resilience: A framework for clinical practice. Family process, 42(1), 1-18. Zolkoski& Bullock (2002). Resilience in children and youth :A review. Children and Youth Services Review,34(12), 2295-2303. 網站: Staying Connected with Your Teen https://www.childtrends.org/programs/staying-connected-with-your-teen/ Communities That Care http://www.communitiesthatcare.netChildhood Adverse Experiences https://www.childtrends.org/publications/adverse-childhood-experiences-national-and-state-level-prevalence/ 余漢儀 (2005)。親屬寄養之迷思:家族責任抑或國家分擔。 社會政策與社會工作學刊,9 (2),1-30。 張菁芬 (2006)。解析高風險家庭的服務策略。社區發展季刊, 114,77-85。 莊文芳 (2009)。賦權 vs.父權:論充權觀點在少年安置機構之應用。兒童及少年福利,16,89-106。 曾華源、白倩如、李仰慈 (2009)。家庭 VS. 房舍: 台灣轉向安置機構對偏差行為少年福利服務品質之研究。 兒童及少年福利期刊,16,35-62。 陶蕃瀛、周慧香、蕭琮琦 (2003)。家外安置過程與寄養服務 指標之研究。內政部兒童局。 |